Radified Community Forums

Radified Community Forums
http://radified.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl Rad Community Technical Discussion Boards (Computer Hardware + PC Software) >> Norton Ghost 2003, Ghost v8.x + Ghost Solution Suite (GSS) Discussion Board >> Why not WinLame? http://radified.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1000028794 Message started by lesserdeity on Sep 9^th, 2001 at 5:46am

Title: Why not WinLame?
Post by lesserdeity on Sep 9^th, 2001 at 5:46am

Hello,

I'm new here so I may have overlooked this. In reading the various pages I noticed that it was recommended to download LAME then install RazorLame as a GUI front end to it. However, WinLame is available as a complete GUI application from the LAME website and requires no compiling or anything - it's just ready to go. Is there some reason WinLame should not be used?

Thanks,
Ray Mitchell
lesserdeity@yahoo.com

Title: Re: Why not WinLame?
Post by Radministrator on Sep 10^th, 2001 at 6:17am

less,

razorlame does not require compiling.

winlame is still in development. see here:

http://winlame.sourceforge.net/

Rad

Title: Re: Why not WinLame?
Post by Citezen_Kang on Sep 18^th, 2001 at 5:30pm

Are you aware of Win32Lame? It packages both Lame and Razorlame together, thus eliminating the steps that Lesser pointed out above (download LAME then install RazorLame seperately).

See http://r3mix.net/ Click on the "News" section, and on that page there is a link to download Win32lame provided at the very top under the "Current Recommended Encoder" box.

Most current version of Win32lame v1.7 (Razorlame 1.1.4 and Lame v3.90)

Title: Re: Why not WinLame?
Post by Radministrator on Sep 19^th, 2001 at 4:21am

Kang,

No win32 'release' binaries have been released yet. See here:

http://www.win32lame.com/pages/rel_Win32_Bin.html