Radified Community Forums

Radified Community Forums
http://radified.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl Rad Community Technical Discussion Boards (Computer Hardware + PC Software) >> Norton Ghost 2003, Ghost v8.x + Ghost Solution Suite (GSS) Discussion Board >> Ghost Question http://radified.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1023763823 Message started by Richard on Jun 10^th, 2002 at 10:50pm

Title: Ghost Question
Post by Richard on Jun 10^th, 2002 at 10:50pm

8) In making a Ghost image, is there any particular advantage or disadvantage to using none, fast or high compression? I have always used high compression. Restoring the image worked fine and it saved my little hiney once. Don't know what I would do without Rad's advice .

:P Now, where can I find a chapter of mp3 downloads anonomous?
Richard

Title: Re: Ghost Question
Post by Radministrator on Jun 10^th, 2002 at 11:49pm

read step #10 here:

http://ghost.radified.com/ghost_2.htm

more compression = smaller file = longer to image.

Title: Re: Ghost Question
Post by Richard on Jun 11^th, 2002 at 10:20pm

I know that. Aside from the file size and image speed issues, do the three choices affect the quality or reliability of the image? I don't mind waiting for a small file if it is otherwise as good and reliable as a big ole fast one.
Richard

Title: Re: Ghost Question
Post by Radministrator on Jun 11^th, 2002 at 11:17pm

some ppl see compression as a bad thing, but i've never had a problem with high.