Radified Community Forums | |
http://radified.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl
Rad Community Technical Discussion Boards (Computer Hardware + PC Software) >> Norton Ghost 2003, Ghost v8.x + Ghost Solution Suite (GSS) Discussion Board >> GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? http://radified.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1147910755 Message started by El_Pescador on May 17th, 2006 at 7:05pm |
Title: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by El_Pescador on May 17th, 2006 at 7:05pm Brian wrote on Mar 5th, 2006 at 5:50pm:
Since I have already purchased two retail boxed copies of Norton Ghost 10.0, I legitimately have restoreghost.exe and ghostexp.exe on hand. My question is twofold: (1) can ghostsrv.exe and ghostcdr.dll be incorporated into a BartPE-XPE (reatogo edition) CD in a practical fashion; and (2) if so, then how do I lawfully go about obtaining obtaining ghostsrv.exe and ghostcdr.dll at an absolute minimal price. EP :'( |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by Pleonasm on May 18th, 2006 at 10:34am
El_Pescador, good question – and I hope that a satisfactory answer comes to light.
It seems to me that your best recourse in this circumstance may be to contact Symantec directly. |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by El_Pescador on May 18th, 2006 at 1:26pm Pleonasm wrote on May 18th, 2006 at 10:34am:
Posed my question in the original post by eMail to Symantec Online Customer service - their response below: EP :'( |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by Brian on May 18th, 2006 at 2:56pm
EP,
I've seen BartPE CDs that contain these files. The files enable GhostCast server and the ability to burn images to CD/DVD. I don't need these features. Would you use them? |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by Pleonasm on May 18th, 2006 at 3:24pm
El_Pescador, what do the folks at the Symantec Store say?
|
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by El_Pescador on May 18th, 2006 at 4:28pm Brian wrote on May 18th, 2006 at 2:56pm:
Pleonasm wrote on May 18th, 2006 at 3:24pm:
EP :'( |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by Brian on May 18th, 2006 at 4:44pm El_Pescador wrote on May 18th, 2006 at 4:28pm:
OK. I think we need to hear from someone who uses Ghost 8.x professionally from BartPE. Does it have networking, SATA or USB advantages over the DOS version? Does the GhostCast server work? Do professionals avoid BartPE? Anyone care to help us understand this application? |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by El_Pescador on May 20th, 2006 at 1:52pm Pleonasm wrote on May 18th, 2006 at 10:34am:
The question posed initially to Symantec Online Customer service - and subsequently to the Symantec Store - is displayed below: Displayed immediately below is the response from Symantec Online Customer service; below that is the response from the Symantec Store: While I certainly intend to follow up with the recommendation to seek technical assistance as outlined above, this morining I was both amused and gratified to receive the eMail message portrayed below: EP :'( |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by El_Pescador on May 22nd, 2006 at 7:34pm Pleonasm wrote on May 18th, 2006 at 10:34am:
Received this automated response 14:58 CDT, May 20th (still awaiting actual contact from Symantec Authorized Technical Support): EP :'( |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by NightOwl on May 22nd, 2006 at 9:07pm
El_Pescador
Quote:
Well, let's see--a Corporate Ghost license runs about $40 each with a minimum of 10 licences (Purchase License) --maybe we could get together and send Rad $40 each--and if we can find 10 folks to go along--Rad could purchase the 10 licenses and then distribute the copies to the 10 investors. Hmmm....I wonder if Symantec would let us do that?! :D |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by El_Pescador on May 23rd, 2006 at 2:08pm NightOwl wrote on May 22nd, 2006 at 9:07pm:
I suspect there is a bit of "tongue-in-cheek" in the proposal above. Nonetheless, I find it very appealing indeed from my perspective. But yet, on the other hand, I fear it smacks of pursuing the so-called esoteric as long as "rank-and-file" users continue to be confronted with the bulk-purchase condition. I have been informed - but without verification - that ghostsrv.exe and ghostcdr.dll can be downloaded for a fee at several sites on the Internet. EP :'( |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by El_Pescador on May 23rd, 2006 at 8:55pm NightOwl wrote on May 22nd, 2006 at 9:07pm:
Vas ist 'License Software' und 'License Certificate' ::) EP :'( |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by El_Pescador on Jun 10th, 2006 at 5:49pm Pleonasm wrote on May 18th, 2006 at 10:34am:
El_Pescador wrote on May 22nd, 2006 at 7:34pm:
Here it is almost three weeks later, and I am still awaiting actual contact from Symantec Authorized Technical Support. After assuming ample time had elapsed for said contact to occur, I went ahead and responded to the Symantec Customer Support Feedback survey - the results of which are shown below: EP :'( |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by Pleonasm on Jun 12th, 2006 at 12:12pm
El_Pescador, if it were not so sad, this series of communications would be humorous. Here is a case where you have “cash-in-hand” and want to make a purchase (or, at least, get more information about making a purchase), and there is no meaningful reply.
Maybe you should send Symantec an email with the subject line “Why Won’t You Take My Money?” – and see if it grabs the attention of anyone. ;) |
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by Pleonasm on Jul 5th, 2006 at 4:14pm
El_Pescador, any response from Symantec on this issue?
|
Title: Re: GHOST 8.2: Staying 'legit' with BartPE-XPE ??? Post by El_Pescador on Jul 5th, 2006 at 9:07pm Pleonasm wrote on Jul 5th, 2006 at 4:14pm:
I have heard nary a peep, and more is the pity. Regrettably, I have been otherwise preoccupied recently as my bride of 42+ years is scheduled to have a surgically-implanted total knee replacement tomorrow, and thus she will be unable to reside in our cozy FEMA-spec travel trailer following her discharge from the hospital. So, I have been sorely engaged of late with a rush project to make our hurricane-stricken home "semi-livable" ASAP. In 1999, my wife retired from Lockheed Martin at the NASA Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans where the External Tank for the Space Shuttle is constructed. Following the launch of Discovery yesterday, I was astounded by the subsequent Associated Press announcement that 47 percent of the 2,000 NASA/MAF personnel - who were my wife's former co-workers - suffered either severe damage to or total destruction of their homes in Hurricane Katrina. Remarkably, many of the workers who immediately "turned-to" in the wake of the storm are still living in FEMA-spec travel trailers on the grounds of the facility. EP :'( |
Radified Community Forums » Powered by YaBB 2.4! YaBB © 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved. |