Please explain. If you want Ghost, just buy it. If not, what do you want? Your post does not make this clear at all. What are you after?

Not intending to be gruff, just to the point.

Thanks,

Dave

dbird wrote on Jun 1^st, 2007 at 9:30pm:

I need an advice from an experts and that's what the forum for. An advise from an experts is my main question.

If you just wanna go with Ghost or NSR or another program that you think is good without thinking first, just go with it. But me, I need to think, find informations, talk and ask to someone (experts).

That's my point.

rulirahm,

Sorry, that's a files and folder backup error message and I've only tried one of these backups as a test. There were no errors. I use other files and folder backup software, which I prefer.

I think NSR should suit most people. Few will need the extra features of Ghost 12 and there is a $20 price difference.

This may help... or not.

I use Ghost 9, and do a scheduled incremental backup once a week; a full new image about once a month.

But, to get intermediate points between scheduled, I use Roxio's BackupMyPC (cheap and effective and conventional) to manually save mail, and other fast changing or important stuff that changes during the week. I frequently get lazy on these manual in-between backups, unless I know that I'm going to do something potentially dangerous. But I've been lucky so far and I'm happy with the result. It suits the way I use my system, which is turned off about half of the time, in used intensively most of the rest of the time, except for the window of time used for scheduled backups.

I have no experience with NS&R, but it sounds interesting. It might be good to have an integrated solution. I may look into it in the future.

Thanks for bringing this up. I was not aware of NS&R and it's relationship to the ghost line.

Dave