Welcome, Guest. Please Login
 
  HomeHelpSearchLogin FAQ Radified Ghost.Classic Ghost.New Bootable CD Blog  
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Ghost 2003.793 Backup Results Submitted For Expert Review (Read 3120 times)
Teefermup
N00b
Offline


I Love Radified!

Posts: 7


Back to top
Ghost 2003.793 Backup Results Submitted For Expert Review
Aug 28th, 2008 at 2:33pm
 
I made a standard boot floppy with the -split=650 switch in the

parameters field.

After booting to the floppy I used Options to set the -auto switch and

unchecked the -span option.  All other options were left as is.  (On

the Image Type tab the Default circle was used.)  The backup was

done to a FAT32 partition. 

The finished backup consisted of five 650 mb chunks and one 133 mb

chunk.  When I ran the Integrity Check only one of the ghost files

showed in the selection field but the check apparently occurred on all

of the chunks.  The Integrity Check was successfully completed.

When I looked at the backup partition back in Windows XP it was

designated as NTFS and I originally formatted it to FAT32. 


1.  Are these backup chunks compromised in any way by the partition changing from FAT32 to NTFS?

2.  Should I reformat this partition in FAT32 and redo the backup or reformat in NTFS and redo the backup?

3.  If I need to restore an image do I need the Serial Number from the registration process to restore the image?

4.  When restoring an image would I need to write an MBR to the disk first (using MBR AutoWrite bootable CD) or after the restore?

                    Sincerely,  Teefermup
 
 
IP Logged
 

TheShadow
Kahuna
*****
Offline


Old Ghost user!

Posts: 613
Florida, USA


Back to top
Re: Ghost 2003.793 Backup Results Submitted For Expert Review
Reply #1 - Aug 29th, 2008 at 9:35am
 
As an old time user of Ghost, I'd have to ask, why set the 'chunks' to such a small value?  I see no purpose or advantage to doing that.
If you were going to store those 'chunks' on DVD's, for instance, the default size of 2 gig would be just fine, as two 'chunks' would then fit on a singel DVD.
The larger the 'chunks' are and the fewer there are, the less chance of errors.

I have no clue why your second drive is formatted as NTFS......if somehow you formatted it in Windows, that's what it would be by default.
To get it formatted in FAT-32, you'd have to do that from a DOS boot disk with the Format program on it.

Now, to get it back to FAT-32, you have to either reformat it in DOS or use the "Convert" option in 'Partition Magic 8".
I've done that a few times, but you first need to run Chkdsk /r to make certain that there are NO errors on the HD, or PM8's Convert function will fail and you could be stuck with a NON-Readable HD.

Since Ghost can and does see a NTFS drive with NO problems, the format of the drive that holds the Ghost Backup Image Files is unimportant.
I prefer FAT-32 for ease of access, even from a DOS boot disk.

I don't see where 'serial number' comes into the game at all. ???

If you've backed up an NTFS C: drive and you're going to restore the image to a new drive, there is NO need to format the drive.  That Image should be a "Disk to Image" backup and NOT a "Partition to Image" backup.

All this has been written up extensively in this very forum.
Read!  Read!  Read!

Cheers Mate!
Shadow  Cool



 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Teefermup
N00b
Offline


I Love Radified!

Posts: 7


Back to top
Re: Ghost 2003.793 Backup Results Submitted For Expert Review
Reply #2 - Aug 29th, 2008 at 2:33pm
 
The chunks are 650mb because I am copying to 700mb CD-Rs.

The format change was from FAT32 (formatted by Parted Magic 2.0) to NTFS as a result of the Ghost backup.  Why this would happen I do not know so I will just reformat the GHOST backup partition to NTFS with Disk Manager in Computer Management Console (after running chkdsk /r).

The restore question was about restoring to the current hard drive I have.  Ghost has some confusing options about backing up the MBR so what I was asking was whether I need to write the MBR to the disk before or after restoring the Ghost backup.

                 Sincerely,  Teefermup
 
 
IP Logged
 
ben_mott
Nuclear Grade
****
Offline



Posts: 278


Back to top
Re: Ghost 2003.793 Backup Results Submitted For Expert Review
Reply #3 - Aug 29th, 2008 at 3:37pm
 
Quote:
to NTFS as a result of the Ghost backup.


it looks like a clone rather than a disk to image
if you see what i mean if the partition was Fat 32 then an image file gets
written to it.and it is not going to change the format.
I am not a ghost expert so I leave you to shadows .
and the other experts.
Ben
Smiley
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print