Welcome, Guest. Please Login
 
  HomeHelpSearchLogin FAQ Radified Ghost.Classic Ghost.New Bootable CD Blog  
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
NTFS vs FAT32 (Read 2151 times)
Dirk B
Radmeister
**
Offline


I Love Radified!

Posts: 93
Monterey, CA  USA


Back to top
NTFS vs FAT32
Jun 21st, 2009 at 11:47am
 
I have a 500GB Western Digital My Book ES external usb/eSATA hard drive.  It came, and still is formatted FAT32.  As such it has 32KB sectors.  If I format it NTFS, it will have 4KB sectors.  Is there a good/any reason not to reformat it NTFS?  I think it will be used primarily as a destination for backup images.
 
 
IP Logged
 

Pleonasm
Übermensch
*****
Offline



Posts: 1619


Back to top
Re: NTFS vs FAT32
Reply #1 - Jun 21st, 2009 at 4:24pm
 
DirkB, to some extent, it is a matter of personal preference. However, note that NTFS is a more robust file system than FAT and therefore, in almost all circumstances, is the better choice.
 

ple • o • nasm n. “The use of more words than are required to express an idea”
 
IP Logged
 
Dirk B
Radmeister
**
Offline


I Love Radified!

Posts: 93
Monterey, CA  USA


Back to top
Re: NTFS vs FAT32
Reply #2 - Jun 21st, 2009 at 5:06pm
 
Thanks Pleo.  I suppose I should probably format the drive as an extended partition, as I will not be using it to boot?
 
 
IP Logged
 
Spanky
Radmeister
**
Offline


Rad's non-Admin Test profile
in Seamonkey

Posts: 73
Same as Rad


Back to top
Re: NTFS vs FAT32
Reply #3 - Jun 21st, 2009 at 9:51pm
 
yeah. ntfs. but do a reformat not a conversation.

once you start putting data on it, it gets harder to reformat.

mine is fat32 .. was given to me, 500 gig seagate.

wish it was ntfs.

all new externals now seem to come fomatted as ntfs.
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print