Welcome, Guest. Please Login
 
  HomeHelpSearchLogin FAQ Radified Ghost.Classic Ghost.New Bootable CD Blog  
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Ghost Question (Read 3507 times)
Richard
Ex Member




Back to top
Ghost Question
Jun 10th, 2002 at 10:50pm
 
8)  In making a Ghost image, is there any particular advantage or disadvantage to using none, fast or high compression?  I have always used high compression. Restoring the image worked fine and it saved my little hiney once.  Don't know what I would do without Rad's advice .

Tongue  Now, where can I find a chapter of mp3 downloads anonomous?
Richard
 
 
IP Logged
 

Rad
Radministrator
*****
Offline


Sufferin' succotash

Posts: 4090
Newport Beach, California


Back to top
Re: Ghost Question
Reply #1 - Jun 10th, 2002 at 11:49pm
 
read step #10 here:

http://ghost.radified.com/ghost_2.htm

more compression = smaller file = longer to image.
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Richard
Ex Member




Back to top
Re: Ghost Question
Reply #2 - Jun 11th, 2002 at 10:20pm
 
I know that.  Aside from the file size and image speed issues, do the three choices affect the quality or reliability of the image?  I don't mind waiting for a small file if it is otherwise as good and reliable as a big ole fast one.
Richard
 
 
IP Logged
 
Rad
Radministrator
*****
Offline


Sufferin' succotash

Posts: 4090
Newport Beach, California


Back to top
Re: Ghost Question
Reply #3 - Jun 11th, 2002 at 11:17pm
 
some ppl see compression as a bad thing, but i've never had a problem with high.
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print