Welcome, Guest. Please
Login
Home
Help
Search
Login
FAQ
Radified
Ghost.Classic
Ghost.New
Bootable CD
Blog
Radified Community Forums
›
Rad Community Technical Discussion Boards (Computer Hardware + PC Software)
›
Norton Ghost 2003, Ghost v8.x + Ghost Solution Suite (GSS) Discussion Board
› Error: NTFS Signature, should not be FAT32
(Moderators: Rad, Christer, NightOwl, Pleonasm, MrMagoo, El_Pescador)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
Error: NTFS Signature, should not be FAT32 (Read 5643 times)
Mathijs
Ex Member
Back to top
Error: NTFS Signature, should not be FAT32
Jan 23
rd
, 2008 at 4:02am
Hi,
After following the excellent tutorial about a bootable ghost cd
I am recieving the following error when I start ghost.exe:
NTFS signature, should not be FAT32
What could cause this problem?
I have the following configuration:
- Laptop with no floppy drive (hence the boot cd)
- 1 Disk 100Gb
- 2 Partitions both NTFS, 1st partition has Windows XP installed
After some googling, I did found some information which indicates that maybe my
master boot record contains some inconsistant information about my drive.
There where 3 possible solutions:
- Running Fdisk with the /mbr option
- Running the XP recovery tool with the /fixmbr option
- Running MBRWiz /Repair=1 (see
www.mbrwizard.com
)
But i'm afraid that these options might kill my XP installation.
And thats what i'm trying to backup, not destroy
Or maybe I'm looking in the wrong direction and it has nothing to do with the
MBR?
Any help is appreciated,
Thank you,
Mathijs
IP Logged
Nigel Bree
Ex Member
Back to top
Re: Error: NTFS Signature, should not be FAT32
Reply #1 -
Jan 23
rd
, 2008 at 4:48pm
Quote:
What could cause this problem?
There isn't any one single cause; unfortunately it's a really badly-written error message, but it actually comes from the FAT filesystem code which is complaining that what it's looking at seems to be NTFS rather than FAT.
Why it gets into trying the FAT filesystem code depends on a lot of other factors; it could be because the MBR has the wrong code for the partition (which is type 7 for NTFS), or it could be because it's a type 7 partition but it already tried mounting it as NTFS and it decided it probably wasn't. Or maybe something else, it's hard to tell.
It's impossible to say which situation applies without seeing dumps of the MBR and of the first sector of the NTFS partitions, and of course Ghost 2003 is now pretty long in the tooth and the newer versions of the code have had all this changed around since then (largely as a result of Dell hidden utility partitions moving from FAT to NTFS, which confused the filesystem identification picture some more).
I've personally never seen this error, it's pretty rare, and the few cases that were ever actually reported to us it tended to be difficult to get the dumps of the relevant sectors or discover what lead to them being the way they were, so it's hard to give any solid advice on working around it. Using something like MBRWizard seems reasonably as a first attempt though, and although I've never had any cause to use it some other folks here speak about it positively and I'd say it's the best bet of the three options you present.
IP Logged
Mathijs
Ex Member
Back to top
Re: Error: NTFS Signature, should not be FAT32
Reply #2 -
Jan 24
th
, 2008 at 12:55am
Hi Nigel,
Thank you for your response!
Yesterday I took the risk of running MBRWizard and it worked!
It left my XP installation intact. It did reload some devices when I restarted,
but it worked!
Now ghost start as excpected. I also made an image of my first partition without
any problems.
I/m not sure what caused this problem, but maybe it had to do with the way XP
got installed on my laptop.
The laptop originally came with Vista, but our system administrators downgraded it
with a XP image (as al laptops have in our company).
Maybe that caused the problem.
Thanks,
Mathijs
IP Logged
Nigel Bree
Ex Member
Back to top
Re: Error: NTFS Signature, should not be FAT32
Reply #3 -
Jan 24
th
, 2008 at 4:28am
Quote:
The laptop originally came with Vista, but our system administrators downgraded it with a XP image (as al laptops have in our company).
Maybe that caused the problem.
It's very possible, your corporate admins are likely to use some kind of special deployment tools like the corporate version of Ghost, Altiris RapidDeploy or perhaps something else. So, perhaps something about the process they used has lead to this.
Whatever tools they use, this is a good chance to narrow down the process that leads to this happening - and that's actually the most important thing we need to learn to get the underlying problem fixed. Since the problem is so rare, it's not something our QA folks are going to come across with their testing so would be nice to learn more.
So if you don't mind asking them how they deployed your laptop it'd be useful information. Lots of company IT folks are sensitive about this kind of thing, so if they want it to be private, it can be arranged.
IP Logged
Brian
Demigod
Offline
Posts: 6345
NSW, Australia
Back to top
Re: Error: NTFS Signature, should not be FAT32
Reply #4 -
Jan 30
th
, 2008 at 4:00pm
Mathijs,
Is your laptop an Asus brand?
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Rad Community Technical Discussion Boards (Computer Hardware + PC Software)
- Norton Ghost 15, 14, 12, 10, 9, + Norton Save + Restore (NS+R)
- Norton Ghost 2003, Ghost v8.x + Ghost Solution Suite (GSS) Discussion Board ««
- Cloning Programs (Except Norton Ghost)
- NightOwl's Bootable CD/DVD
- PC Hardware + Software (except Cloning programs)
Rad Community Non-Technical Discussion Boards
- The Water Cooler
- YaBB Forum Software + Rad Web Site
Radified Community Forums
» Powered by
YaBB 2.4
!
YaBB
© 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved.