Here's the 3 links copied from the
FAQ section:
Norton Save & Restore Topics:
Overview, information and featuresNorton Save & Restore User Guidehttp://radified.com/cgi-bin/YaBB/YaBB.cgi?board=general;action=display;num=11410...I have Norton Save & Restore in use at one location. The main feature/difference between Norton S&R and Ghost 10 is that S&R added the feature to backup files/folders as well as take full image backups.
Quote: Yes, it's Ghost 10 plus file/folder backup capability.
Quote:is it based on drive image, like ghost 9 & 10?
Yes.
However, I would say that Norton Save and Restore is more of a "marketing" renaming (just my opinion here). If you review the press releases and marketing and features, you will see they are appealing to the masses with the revised name, and specifically hyping the saving of documents, pictures, files.
The other aspect of it (my opinion) is that Symantec appears to have taken about a 3 step evolution of the product line:
1. Ghost 2003 and previous DOS versions imaging.
2. Ghost 9, 10 imaging using XP.
3. Norton Save & Restore, emphasizing Recovery Points rather than image backup and restore. You can almost read into this they incorporated the Norton GoBack software, which I think is discontinued now.
Finally, the file/folder backup capability is most likely partially in response to Acronis's True Image 9.1 which has that, as well as all the "one touch" backup buttons on external usb hard drives. Symantec I believe has tried to create a "one touch Save and Restore" product capability for those that want that.
Conclusion: Norton Save & Restore is a product name that the general public will likely recognize (as opposed to Ghost) the purpose of. Call it dumbing-down if you want. That's the marketing.
For us techie-types here, if you disregard the file/folder backup capability, then you have Ghost 11, which is the way I use it.
Quote:It works as good as Ghost 10.0. You can define separate backups to separate targets that are just certain data folders, or all files, such as *.doc files, so it is fairly powerful in terms of data file strategy backup.
Considering that most pc user's don't backup anything, it is probably a good product for that. Yet it remains faithful to the Ghost 10 imaging audience.
(All other opinions gladly solicited.)