Welcome, Guest. Please
Login
Home
Help
Search
Login
FAQ
Radified
Ghost.Classic
Ghost.New
Bootable CD
Blog
Radified Community Forums
›
Rad Community Technical Discussion Boards (Computer Hardware + PC Software)
›
Norton Ghost 2003, Ghost v8.x + Ghost Solution Suite (GSS) Discussion Board
› Ghost 2003 vs Ghost 8.x vs Ghost 11.x
(Moderators: Rad, Christer, NightOwl, Pleonasm, MrMagoo, El_Pescador)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
Ghost 2003 vs Ghost 8.x vs Ghost 11.x (Read 23395 times)
Nigel Bree
Ex Member
Back to top
Re: Ghost 2003 vs Ghost 8.x vs Ghost 11.x
Reply #15 -
Aug 12
th
, 2008 at 4:13pm
TheShadow wrote
on Aug 12
th
, 2008 at 8:28am:
I keep saying this and I guess no one's paying attention or doesn't understand what I'm saying (US English spoken here).
No, we understand perfectly.
TheShadow wrote
on Aug 12
th
, 2008 at 8:28am:
NO, you can't take ghost images off of a hard drive, put them on DVD's and expect Ghost to restore them from the DVD's
This has
always
been possible, it simply required planning to do because of the limitations of ISO9660 filesystems in DOS when accessed through MSCSDEX (so, the base image and the spans had to have sensible 8.3 names).
Similar considerations apply to moving images; you
can
move them, but you need to ensure that the 8.3 names of the files are kept if you're working with a DOS-based version of Ghost.
In later current versions, this limitation is less important; every version we do does more to remove dependencies on this historical 8.3 limitation of DOS, especially when using Windows PE as the restore environment.
IP Logged
K Singh
Radmeister
Offline
Posts: 93
Devil's Paradise
Back to top
Re: Ghost 2003 vs Ghost 8.x vs Ghost 11.x
Reply #16 -
Aug 18
th
, 2008 at 5:28am
Hi TheShadow
I agree with Nigel regarding the restoration. Maybe because my experience is only based on Ghost 8.3 or 11.
So far i can say on the moving of ghost images across harddisk and restoring. I have not tried DVD options.
I create a backup in my hdd by creating a backup folder in D/E drive (backing C drive). I give the name normally CImage. Let ghost add number extensions when i give the split option of 700 or 4GB.
I have tried moving it across HDDs(external USB hdd) and restore it from them. It works fine.
Quote:
Similar considerations apply to moving images; you can move them, but you need to ensure that the 8.3 names of the files are kept if you're working with a DOS-based version of Ghost.
I think Nigel has said it right. I didn't fiddle around with the names. Just kept the same what the ghost created.
Maybe will try it with DVDs and update you.
IP Logged
TheShadow
Kahuna
Offline
Old Ghost user!
Posts: 613
Florida, USA
Back to top
Re: Ghost 2003 vs Ghost 8.x vs Ghost 11.x
Reply #17 -
Aug 18
th
, 2008 at 5:43pm
I was specifically referring to making images to a hard drive and then moving them (burning them with Nero, etc.) to DVD's and expecting Ghost to ask for the second, third, etc., DVD to effect the restore.
Did I fail (again) to make myself clear? Evidently!
English spoken here!
The 8.3 filename thingy really has nothing to do with what I was trying to say!
Sorry!
Shadow
IP Logged
Nigel Bree
Ex Member
Back to top
Re: Ghost 2003 vs Ghost 8.x vs Ghost 11.x
Reply #18 -
Aug 19
th
, 2008 at 2:17am
TheShadow wrote
on Aug 18
th
, 2008 at 5:43pm:
I was specifically referring to making images to a hard drive and then moving them (burning them with Nero, etc.) to DVD's and expecting Ghost to ask for the second, third, etc., DVD to effect the restore.
That's exactly what I said works, and it does work, and it always has worked. I've done it plenty of times, doing this has been part of Ghost's design since about v3.0 when Plextor licensed it for their CD-ResQ product (or maybe they licensed 4.0, I forget) and the only real caveats are that a) you have to not be an idiot and use ISO9660 and not UDF so that MSCDEX can mount the disk, and b) if the 8.3 filenames aren't quite how Ghost wants during the restore it'll prompt at every span instead of only the end of the disk.
There is no file format difference between CD and Hard disk images
with the sole exception that when writing directly to a CD, the spans Ghost writes are missing the normal file signature at the start of a hard disk span - and there's a single bit in the initial .GHO that says it did that instead of writing the normal hard-disk span format. That is the sole file-format difference between the two, and all that the CD bit does is turn off a check for that leading header, nothing else. Ghost is otherwise completely happy to restore whatever content it is given.
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Rad Community Technical Discussion Boards (Computer Hardware + PC Software)
- Norton Ghost 15, 14, 12, 10, 9, + Norton Save + Restore (NS+R)
- Norton Ghost 2003, Ghost v8.x + Ghost Solution Suite (GSS) Discussion Board ««
- Cloning Programs (Except Norton Ghost)
- NightOwl's Bootable CD/DVD
- PC Hardware + Software (except Cloning programs)
Rad Community Non-Technical Discussion Boards
- The Water Cooler
- YaBB Forum Software + Rad Web Site
Radified Community Forums
» Powered by
YaBB 2.4
!
YaBB
© 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved.