Welcome, Guest. Please
Login
Home
Help
Search
Login
FAQ
Radified
Ghost.Classic
Ghost.New
Bootable CD
Blog
Radified Community Forums
›
Rad Community Technical Discussion Boards (Computer Hardware + PC Software)
›
Norton Ghost 2003, Ghost v8.x + Ghost Solution Suite (GSS) Discussion Board
› Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencing
(Moderators: Rad, Christer, NightOwl, Pleonasm, MrMagoo, El_Pescador)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
...
5
Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencing (Read 47210 times)
Pleonasm
Übermensch
Offline
Posts: 1619
Back to top
Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencing
Nov 21
st
, 2006 at 9:00am
In last year's version of Diskeeper, the company introduced its Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencing Technology and it has now been improved in the current
Diskeeper 2007 Pro Premier
utility. I-FAAST claims to improve disk speed an average of 10% to 20%
over and above the performance enhancement gained by defragmentation alone
. Well, I was skeptical – but decided to give it a try nonetheless.
Initially, I-FAAST monitors your file system usage and assesses the performance characteristics of your PC's specific hard disk drives for about a week. After the learning period, it then silently and invisibly organizes files for maximum performance. In my case, the tool reports an 18% performance enhancement. Whether the number is exactly correct or not, I can't say – but I can report that I-FAAST does add a quite noticeable and pleasant degree of "zip" back into the PC. It is definitely worth trying, if you're incredulous like me.
To learn how and why I-FAAST is different than other file placement/sequencing strategies available on the market, read:
Comparing I-FAAST
For an overview of I-FAAST, see:
Inside I-FAAST
ple • o • nasm
n. “The use of more words than are required to express an idea”
IP Logged
Rad
Radministrator
Offline
Sufferin' succotash
Posts: 4090
Newport Beach, California
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #1 -
Nov 21
st
, 2006 at 11:23am
what drive are you running your o/s from, pleo?
7200-rpm? 10,000-rpm? sata?
in the past diskkeeper poo-poo'ed speed optimizations, in favor of pure defrags. i remember trading a few emails with them.
placing your most-used files in the faster parts of the disk, and the least-used files in the slowest parts of the disk is something i've always advocated with my partitioning strategies.
http://partition.radified.com/
the only downside i can see to speed optimizations is that it will take longer to "degrag" (since you are doing more than merely defragging).
IP Logged
NightOwl
Radministrator
Offline
"I tought I saw a puddy
tat..."
Posts: 5826
Olympia, WA--Puget Sound--USA
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #2 -
Nov 21
st
, 2006 at 11:34am
Pleonasm
I think *PerfectDisk* has been doing this for awhile, now:
PerfectDisk Features
Quote:
SMARTPlacement™ -- patented file placement strategy
PerfectDisk's SMARTPlacement™ optimization strategy results in faster subsequent defragmentation runs because many of the files on the drive do not need to be moved at all, since they are placed according to users unique usage patterns. Typical defragmenters waste resources by constantly moving all files around on the drive.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
No question is stupid ... but, possibly the answers are
!
IP Logged
NightOwl
Radministrator
Offline
"I tought I saw a puddy
tat..."
Posts: 5826
Olympia, WA--Puget Sound--USA
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #3 -
Nov 21
st
, 2006 at 11:48am
Pleonasm
Hmmm....
Looks like
DiskKeeper Pro Primier
is over twice as expensive as
PerfectDisk Professional
!
____________________________________________________________________________________________
No question is stupid ... but, possibly the answers are
!
IP Logged
Pleonasm
Übermensch
Offline
Posts: 1619
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #4 -
Nov 21
st
, 2006 at 12:22pm
NightOwl, I'm running on Seagate Barracuda Ultra ATA/100 drives (7200 RPM).
Concerning the partitioning strategy observation, the use of an I-FAAST (or equivalent) approach ought to be the better avenue, since the organization of files on the volume are
customized to the user's specific activity pattern as well as the characteristics of the individual hard disk drive
. Additionally, I-FASST (or equivalent) provides a
finer degree of granularity
of potential optimization, since it does not group all operating system and applications files together but rather differentiates among them based on the user's actual activity pattern. (Perhaps a motivated forum member could conduct a test?)
I have used Diskeeper over the years without the I-FAAST technology, and now see no difference in the total duration of a defragmentation operation (it's very fast). Both the defragmentation as well as I-FAAST run transparently in the background (with no observable impact on the user's experience) using the "InvisiTasking" technology.
I haven't used PerfectDisk, and so can't comment on the similarities and differences (although see
Comparing I-FAAST
). I was aware that PerfectDisk has something similar to I-FAAST.
Yep, Diskeeper 2007 Pro Premier isn't inexpensive. But, if you purchase the annual maintenance agreement ($26), upgrades to new versions are free.
ple • o • nasm
n. “The use of more words than are required to express an idea”
IP Logged
NightOwl
Radministrator
Offline
"I tought I saw a puddy
tat..."
Posts: 5826
Olympia, WA--Puget Sound--USA
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #5 -
Nov 21
st
, 2006 at 12:29pm
Pleonasm
Product/Features comparison:
Unique Differences Between PerfectDisk v8.0 and DiskKeeper v10.0
____________________________________________________________________________________________
No question is stupid ... but, possibly the answers are
!
IP Logged
Rad
Radministrator
Offline
Sufferin' succotash
Posts: 4090
Newport Beach, California
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #6 -
Nov 21
st
, 2006 at 12:52pm
Most of the other defraggers have been doing this (speed optimizations) for a while now. Diskkeeper was the lone hold-out, faik.
IP Logged
Brian
Demigod
Offline
Posts: 6345
NSW, Australia
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #7 -
Nov 21
st
, 2006 at 8:38pm
I've been using PerfectDisk 8 for the last 3 weeks. It's the defragger for those who use incremental images.
I've used various versions of Diskeeper on 4 computers over the last few years. Great, fast defragger but it can't do free space consolidation properly. There is always a band of data one or two bars below the main data and this band moves every few day independently of running Diskeeper. When this happens the next incremental image is large, up to 20% of the size of a baseline image.
PerfectDisk really does do free space consolidation properly and runs as fast as Diskeeper. Using Windows, I can't tell if one defragger is better than the other. Not surprising. But, I've never had an incremental image more than 2% of the baseline image size. The average is 1.5%. I'm sure this is because I no longer have that band of intermittently moving data.
IP Logged
Rad
Radministrator
Offline
Sufferin' succotash
Posts: 4090
Newport Beach, California
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #8 -
Nov 21
st
, 2006 at 8:44pm
i've been using perfect disk the last few years. i like it, never had a problem:
http://www.raxco.com/products/PerfectDisk2k/
IP Logged
Pleonasm
Übermensch
Offline
Posts: 1619
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #9 -
Nov 22
nd
, 2006 at 8:09am
The issue of free space consolidation is a "hot topic" in the world of defragmentation, with very opinionated perspectives on both sides of the argument.
Diskeeper is seeking to accelerate
both
file reads
and new file writes
in
real time
so that the benefits are experienced by the user
immediately and continuously
– it is the only product that does so. In order to accomplish the objective, Diskeeper "optimizes a large chunk of free space, adjacent to where the frequently accessed files reside, near the front of the volume. That free space chuck is specifically in a location so that new file writes can be accelerated." On my PC, the "large chunk" is about 500 MB, I estimate.
The perspective that Diskeeper adopts on free space consolidation is completely in alignment with the position advocated by Microsoft:
Quote:
There has been some confusion in the past regarding free space defragmentation. Some people in the industry believed that after a defragmentation job free space should be consolidated into one pool. Here at Diskeeper Corporation we have long since maintained that this doesn't make sense (see our
whitepaper
on this very subject). Moving free space into one consolidated pool is a temporary condition that wastes resources and serves no purpose. Instead
free space should be grouped in a few contiguous pools
.
Source:
Microsoft and Diskeeper Agree on Free Space Defrag
To understand the issue more completely, read the brief document:
How File Fragmentation Occurs on Windows XP
.
ple • o • nasm
n. “The use of more words than are required to express an idea”
IP Logged
NightOwl
Radministrator
Offline
"I tought I saw a puddy
tat..."
Posts: 5826
Olympia, WA--Puget Sound--USA
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #10 -
Nov 22
nd
, 2006 at 9:21am
Pleonasm
Quote:
The issue of free space consolidation is a "hot topic" in the world of defragmentation, with very opinionated perspectives on both sides of the argument.
Based on Brian's documented experience mentioned in reply #7 above--seems like there's something other than *opinion* to consider in the *arguments*!
____________________________________________________________________________________________
No question is stupid ... but, possibly the answers are
!
IP Logged
Pleonasm
Übermensch
Offline
Posts: 1619
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #11 -
Nov 22
nd
, 2006 at 12:25pm
NightOwl, my reading of Brian's post (Reply #7) is that PerfectDisk works better with one specific application (Ghost 9/Ghost 10) under one specific condition (when incremental recovery points are being created). That's a very good insight to know.
However, the observation doesn't speak to the issue of whether there is any general file system read/write performance gain to be secured by consolidating all free space into one segment. Diskeeper and Microsoft agree that such is not the case.
Diskeeper Corporation is a very substantial organization, with over 20 million licenses sold (making it the best selling defragmenter of all time) and with 288 awards and editor accolades earned in 2006 alone. With the resources and expertise available at its disposal,
if Diskeeper agreed that the consolidation of free space into one segment was beneficial to the user, then it would (obviously) add that feature into the product!
Clearly, the company has
chosen
not to do so, because it has no benefit to the user.
ple • o • nasm
n. “The use of more words than are required to express an idea”
IP Logged
Brian
Demigod
Offline
Posts: 6345
NSW, Australia
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #12 -
Nov 22
nd
, 2006 at 1:26pm
Competing advertising claims! PerfectDisk maintain that Free Space Consolidation is important as it minimizes refragmentation.
Quote:
SMARTPlacement is a patented algorithm of Raxco Software and is used for the best placement of files on your disk to minimize refragmentation. Files are organized by their creation and modified dates. The theory being that files that has not changed recently are less like to change in the future. These older files are grouped together so that once PerfectDisk has SMARTPlaced them, future defragmentation passes are less likely to move them again. This shortens the amount of time needed to keep the drive at peak performance. Also the free space is consolidated next to the newer files since these are more likely to change or be deleted. Consolidating the free space makes the creation of new files contiguous and therefore minimizes refragmentation of your drive.
On a subjective basis, I can't tell any difference except that my computer does take about 5 seconds less to boot now that I'm using PerfectDisk.
I tried I-FAAST earlier this year but Diskeeper said something to the effect of "don't bother, the improvement won't be significant."
They are both great products and if I wasn't creating incremental images I'd be happy to use either.
Pleo wrote:
Quote:
performance gain to be secured by consolidating all free space into one segment
I just should point out that there is no free space segment inside the data area. It is after the data area. That's probably what you were inferring anyway.
IP Logged
Pleonasm
Übermensch
Offline
Posts: 1619
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #13 -
Nov 22
nd
, 2006 at 2:36pm
Brian, concerning the assertion that "Consolidating the free space makes the creation of new files contiguous and therefore minimizes refragmentation of your drive", doesn't this research prove otherwise:
How File Fragmentation Occurs on Windows XP
?
When you commented, "Diskeeper said something to the effect of 'don't bother, the improvement won't be significant,'" did you mean that the Diskeeper
application
(or
corporation
) made the statement? The I-FAAST capability in the application will automatically disable itself in cases in which it determines that no meaningful performance gain will be achieved. Fortunately, that's not the situation with my PC - it delivers a quite pleasant and noticeable benefit.
ple • o • nasm
n. “The use of more words than are required to express an idea”
IP Logged
Brian
Demigod
Offline
Posts: 6345
NSW, Australia
Back to top
Re: Intelligent File Access Acceleration Sequencin
Reply #14 -
Nov 22
nd
, 2006 at 3:18pm
Pleonasm wrote
on Nov 22
nd
, 2006 at 2:36pm:
drive", doesn't this research prove otherwise:
How File Fragmentation Occurs on Windows XP
?
I can't follow their graphics. Graphic 2 is quite different from graphic 1. Is it the same partition?
Quote:
'don't bother, the improvement won't
It was a message I saw on my monitor. The new version may be different.
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
...
5
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Rad Community Technical Discussion Boards (Computer Hardware + PC Software)
- Norton Ghost 15, 14, 12, 10, 9, + Norton Save + Restore (NS+R)
- Norton Ghost 2003, Ghost v8.x + Ghost Solution Suite (GSS) Discussion Board ««
- Cloning Programs (Except Norton Ghost)
- NightOwl's Bootable CD/DVD
- PC Hardware + Software (except Cloning programs)
Rad Community Non-Technical Discussion Boards
- The Water Cooler
- YaBB Forum Software + Rad Web Site
Radified Community Forums
» Powered by
YaBB 2.4
!
YaBB
© 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved.